![]() ![]() The map in Figure 1 below represents what I would recommend as an Expanded Secure Relocation Area. Others simply need something closer to the metro area that have to remain in due to job or family reasons. Others need a drier, sunnier climate for health reasons or even more solar potential. Some people, for example, need access to an international airport hub, which doesn’t exist in the Redoubt. However, having consulted with people and designed high security residences for the last 40 years around North America, I realize all too well that most people have financial, distance from family, weather and other personal limitations that simply won’t allow for relocation to an area so far north and remote from their needs as the Redoubt. In reality, it’s a fine area and certainly matches my core recommendations in Strategic Relocation for security, safety and livability, but it may be too limiting for most people. Rawles’ criteria of distance from population threats, defendability, and agricultural suitability focus upon a fairly limited area of the Western US, centered around Idaho, and includes Western Montana and parts of Eastern Washington and Oregon. ![]() I have often been asked to comment on Jim Rawles’ concept of the Redoubt for survival relocation. ![]() This article has been contributed by the Strategic Relocation Blog
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |